Skip to content
Facebook
Bluesky
YouTube
Instagram
Tiktok
LinkedIn
Email
Phone
About Us
Mission, Vision & Information
Our Twenty-Year Timeline
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
What is Sexual Freedom?
Staff
Board of Directors
Ambassadors
Who was Victoria Woodhull?
2023 Impact Report
2022 Impact Report
2021 Impact Report
Our Projects
In the Courts
Fighting FOSTA
About the Lawsuit
Articles & Court Filings
Fighting Age Verification
Testimony & Amici
Education
Censorship Series
Spokes Hub
Human Rights Commissions
Human Rights in Focus: The Fight Against Violence in Sex Work
Entrapment & Harassment
The Censorship of Sexual Freedom
Research
Fact Checked by Woodhull
Deplatforming Sex Workers
Past Programs
Sexual Freedom Summit
Vicki Sexual Freedom Awards
Our Issues
Free Speech
Privacy
Reproductive Freedom
Sexual Health & Pleasure
Sex Work
News & Views
Blog
Press Releases
Media Mentions
Policy Positions
Program Archive
Newsletter Archive
Get Involved
Donate
Stop KOSA!
Stay Informed
Shop Woodhull Merch
Host a Woodhull Speaker
Legislative Support Request
Job Opportunities
Contact Us
Donate Monthly
Search
Open mobile menu
Close mobile menu
Media Mentions
Home
»
Media Mentions
»
Court Says Prostitution Law Doesn’t Violate First Amendment but Language Should Be Interpreted Narrowly
Court Says Prostitution Law Doesn’t Violate First Amendment but Language Should Be Interpreted Narrowly
July 11, 2023
Mandy Salley
previous post:
Court Rules Against Woodhull in FOSTA Appeal
next post:
Leading Digital Rights, Privacy Orgs Urge Immediate Action Against ‘Bad Internet Bills’
Back To Top
Search
Search
Search
