Press Releases
- Woodhull Defends Free Speech In Latest Court Battle Over FOSTA Censorship 2023
- Removing Sex Work From the Internet May Make It More Dangerous: Grant from Woodhull Freedom Foundation to Support John Jay Study 2022
- Woodhull Files Appeal Challenging the Constitutionality of FOSTA 2022
- OnlyFans Statement 2021
- Woodhull Freedom Foundation Files Motion to Declare FOSTA Unconstitutional 2020
- Woodhull Wins FOSTA Appeal 2020
- FOSTA Appeal Moves Forward With Woodhull’s Statement 2018
- Woodhull Freedom Foundation Appeals FOSTA Ruling 2018
- Woodhull Freedom Foundation Files Lawsuit Challenging FOSTA 2018
Media Mentions
- 5 Years After the Backpage Shutdown, Sex Workers—and Free Speech—Are Still Suffering 2023
- Motion to Dismiss Calls Out DOJ Duplicity in Backpage/Woodhull Cases 2023
- Woodhull Defends Free Speech in Latest Court Battle Over FOSTA Censorship 2023
- Appeals Court Panel Seems Skeptical That FOSTA Doesn’t Violate the First Amendment 2023
- Woodhull’s FOSTA Challenge Lays Bare DOJ’s Lies in Lacey/Larkin Case 2023
- Appeals Court Seems Poised to Void Part of Sex Trafficking Law 2023
- How a War on Porn is Endangering US Sex Workers 2023
- BREAKING: Woodhull Defends Free Speech In Latest Court Battle Over FOSTA Censorship 2023
- Woodhull Files New Reply Brief Challenging FOSTA 2022
- There’s No Way FOSTA Isn’t a First Amendment Violation, Says Lawsuit 2022
- Woodhull Files New Brief Challenging Constitutionality of FOSTA-SESTA 2022
- OnlyFans Is Finally Showing Some Political Support for Sex Work 2022
- Plaintiffs Press Appeals Court to Rule That FOSTA Violates the First Amendment 2022
- Woodhull Appeals Case Challenging FOSTA Constitutionality 2022
- Woodhull Files Appeal in FOSTA-SESTA Challenge Suit 2022
- Woodhull Freedom Foundation Files Motion to Declare FOSTA Unconstitutional 2022
- Top Digital Rights Organization Highlights Woodhull’s Anti-FOSTA Litigation 2020
- Federal Court Hears Woodhull’s Appeal Challenging FOSTA 2019
Court Filings
- 11/22/2022 Woodhull Freedom Foundation, et al. v. USA, et al. Appellant Reply Brief
- 11/14/2022 Woodhull v. FOSTA. Woodhull et al v. the United States of America Memorandum to Counsel Concerning Cases Set for Oral Argument
- 11/02/2022 Woodhull v. FOSTA. Woodhull et al v. the United States of America Brief for Appellees
- 9/13/2022: Transgender Law Center Amicus Brief in Support of Appellants
- 9/13/2022: Center for Democracy and Technology Amicus Brief in Support of Appellants
- 9/13/2022: Decriminalize Sex Work Motion to Participate as Amicus Curiae
- 9/13/2022: Decriminalize Sex Work, ET AL., Amicus Brief in Support of Appellants
- 9/13/2022: Coyote Rhode Island Amicus Brief in Support of Appellants
- 9/06/2022 Appellate Brief
- 4/25/2022 Notice of Appeal
- 3/29/22: Memorandum Decision – District Court
- 10/26/20: Reply to Defendants’ Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgement
- 10/26/20: Reply in Support of Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgement
- 10/9/20: Defendants’ Response to Plaintiffs’ Statement of Undisputed Material facts
- 10/9/20: Defendants’ Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment
- 10/9/20: Declaration of Kathryn Wyer
- 10/9/20: Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgement
- 8/31/2020: Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment
- Memo in Support of Plaintiff’s MSJ
- Statement of Facts
- Exhibit A – Kate D’Adamo Declaration
- Ex 1 to D’Adamo Declaration
- Exhibit B – Declaration of J. Ashooh
- Exhibit C – Declaration of Dr. Lutnick
- Exhibit to Lutnick Declaration
- Exhibit D – Declaration of Alexandra Yelderman
- Exhibit to Yelderman Declaration
- Exhibit E – Declaration of Jesse Maley
- Exhibit F – Declaration of Brewster Kahle
- Exhibit G – Declaration of Ricci Levy
- Exhibit to Levy Declaration
- Exhibit H – Declaration of Eric Koszyk
- Exhibit I – Declaration of Dinah Pokempner
- Text of Proposed Order
- 3/18/2020: Formal Mandate
- 1/24/2020: Decision of the US Court of Appeals re: standing
- 9/18/2019: Confirmation of Oral Argument
- 6/21/2019: Oral Arguments Scheduled
- 5/10/2019: Woodhull Reply Brief
- 4/22/2019: Amicus Brief in support of DOJ
- 4/22/2019: Amicus Brief in support of DOJ
- 4/22/2019: Amicus Brief in support of DOJ
- 4/15/2019: Appellee’s Brief
- 3/06/19: court’s order granting the DOJ’s requested extension
- 2/20/19: the Institute for Free Speech Amicus Brief in Support of Appellants
- 2/20/19: Center for Democracy & Technology Amicus Brief in Support of Appellants
- 2/20/19: the Copia Institute et al Amicus Brief in Support of Appellants
- 2/20/19: Freedom Network et al Amicus Brief in Support of Appellants
- 2/13/19: Woodhull v. FOSTA. Woodhull et al v. the United States of America. Merits Brief.
- 12/12/18: Woodhull v. FOSTA. Woodhull et al v. the United States of America, Consent Motion for Extension of Time.
- 11/13/18: Woodhull v. FOSTA. Woodhull et al v. the United States of America. Statement of Issues.
- 10/9/18: Woodhull v. FOSTA. Woodhull et al v. the United States of America. Notice of Appeal.
- 9/24/18: Woodhull v. FOSTA. Woodhull et al v. the United States of America. Memorandum Opinion (response to Preliminary Injunction)
- 8/6/18: Woodhull v. FOSTA. Woodhull et al v. the United States of America Supplemental Brief in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction.
- 8/6/18: Woodhull v. FOSTA. Woodhull et al v. the United States of Ameria Defendants’ Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss and Supplemental Motion Hearing Brief.
- 7/26/18: Woodhull v. FOSTA, Woodhull et al Response to Motion to Dismiss
- 7/16/18: Woodhull v. FOSTA, Woodhull et al Reply to DOJ Opposition
- 7/12/18: Woodhull v. FOSTA, Defendants’ Opposition to Preliminary Injunction Motion
- 6/28/18: Declaration of Ricci Levy in Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction
- 6/28/18: Motion for Preliminary Injunction
- 6/28/18: Full Complaint – Woodhull Freedom Foundation v. United States